![]() You can correct images from scanned slides or negatives this way. ![]() ![]() But yeah, you can do stuff like make vertical lines vertical-at the expense of distorting other geometric relationships.īut what ViewPoint (and Lightroom) will not / cannot do: what do you mean by "wide angle lens distortion correction"? If you mean geometric distortion (typically barrel, sometimes pincushion or more complex forms), then that is not what ViewPoint corrects, that is what the regular program plus an appropriate lens profile corrects.Īctually, VP3 does have all these corrections, manually applied if you want them. ![]() If you mean perspective distortion, that cannot be corrected, and can only be transformed from one type to another-this is a fundamental truth independent of software, go read the section of Ansel Adams' The Camera where he shows the effects of raising the front standard instead of tilting the camera up on the resulting photos of a silo. Lightroom 6 (and IIRC LR 5) has similar, but maybe not quite as good, adjustments built in.īut what ViewPoint (and Lightroom) will not / cannot do: what do you mean by "wide angle lens distortion correction"? If you mean geometric distortion (typically barrel, sometimes pincushion or more complex forms), then that is not what ViewPoint corrects, that is what the regular program plus an appropriate lens profile corrects. I don't think DxO PhotoLab Elite-which I have-comes with these capabilities, which is why you still need ViewPoint. I like it just fine, and got it because I wanted it to integrate fully with DxO Optics Pro (now PhotoLab), which is my raw converter of choice. If you use VP3, how do you like it? Is it all it's cracked up to be, for geometric correction, and wide angle lens distortion correction? Better than what I would get from DXO photolab Elite, or LR Classic?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |